MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reward Processing in Novelty Seekers: A Transdiagnostic Psychiatric Imaging Biomarker

2021· article· en· W3128947369 on OpenAlexaff
Shile Qi, Günter Schumann, Juan Bustillo, Jessica A. Turner, Rongtao Jiang, Dongmei Zhi, Zening Fu, Andrew R. Mayer, Victor M. Vergara, Rogers F. Silva, Armin Iraji, Jiayu Chen, Eswar Damaraju, Xiaohong Ma, Xiao Yang, Michael C. Stevens, Daniel H. Mathalon, Judith M. Ford, James Voyvodic, Bryon A. Mueller, Ayşenil Belger, Steven G. Potkin, Adrian Preda, Chuanjun Zhuo, Yong Xu, Congying Chu, Tobias Banaschewski, Gareth J. Barker, Arun L.W. Bokde, Erin Burke Quinlan, Sylvane Desrivières, Herta Flor, Antoine Grigis, Hugh Garavan, Penny Gowland, Andreas Heinz, Jean‐Luc Martinot, Marie‐Laure Paillère Martinot, Éric Artiges, Frauke Nees, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Tomáš Paus, Luise Poustka, Sarah Hohmann, Juliane H. Fröhner, Michael N. Smolka, Henrik Walter, Robert Whelan, Vince D. Calhoun, Jing Sui (Beijing Normal University), my correct affiliation is beijing normal university, not Qingdao University of Science and Technology, please correct the current affiliation. Thank you

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleNational Institute of Mental HealthHorizon 2020Medical Research CouncilNational Institute on AgingBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionSixth Framework ProgrammeSeventh Framework ProgrammeNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of General Medical SciencesFondation de FranceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean CommissionKing’s College LondonFoundation for the National Institutes of HealthDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftKing's College LondonScience Foundation IrelandNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMajor depressive disorderPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)NoveltyNovelty seekingNeuroimagingAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderBipolar disorderClinical psychologyPsychiatryDysfunctional familyPrefrontal cortexMoodCognitionTemperament

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBiological PsychiatrySame topicNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFrench-language works237,207