Prospective, Single-Arm Trial Evaluating Changes in Uptake Patterns on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Targeted <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Starting Abiraterone or Enzalutamide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PET with small molecules targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is being adopted as a clinical standard for prostate cancer imaging. In this study, we evaluated changes in uptake on PSMA-targeted PET in men starting abiraterone or enzalutamide. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective, single-arm, 2-center, exploratory clinical trial enrolled men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer initiating abiraterone or enzalutamide. Each patient was imaged with <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL at baseline and within 2–4 mo after starting therapy. Patients were followed for up to 48 mo from enrollment. A central review evaluated baseline and follow-up PET scans, recording change in SUV<sub>max</sub> at all disease sites and classifying the pattern of change. Two parameters were derived: the δ-percent SUV<sub>max</sub> (DPSM) of all lesions and the δ-absolute SUV<sub>max</sub> (DASM) of all lesions. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate time to therapy change (TTTC) and overall survival (OS). <b>Results:</b> Sixteen evaluable patients were accrued to the study. Median TTTC was 9.6 mo (95% CI, 6.9–14.2), and median OS was 28.6 mo (95% CI, 18.3–not available [NA]). Patients with a mixed-but-predominantly-increased pattern of radiotracer uptake had a shorter TTTC and OS. Men with a low DPSM had a median TTTC of 12.2 mo (95% CI, 11.3–NA) and a median OS of 37.2 mo (95% CI, 28.9–NA), whereas those with a high DPSM had a median TTTC of 6.5 mo (95% CI, 4.6–NA, <i>P</i> = 0.0001) and a median OS of 17.8 mo (95% CI, 13.9–NA, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Men with a low DASM had a median TTTC of 12.2 mo (95% CI, 11.3–NA) and a median OS of NA (95% CI, 37.2 mo–NA), whereas those with a high DASM had a median TTTC of 6.9 mo (95% CI, 6.1–NA, <i>P</i> = 0.003) and a median OS of 17.8 mo (95% CI, 13.9–NA, <i>P</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings on PSMA-targeted PET 2–4 mo after initiation of abiraterone or enzalutamide are associated with TTTC and OS. Development of new lesions or increasing intensity of radiotracer uptake at sites of baseline disease are poor prognostic findings suggesting shorter TTTC and OS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".