La Traducción en la prensa temprana: La Gaceta de Guatemala (1797-1807) y sus fuentes foráneas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pesar de no haber conseguido todavía el reconocimiento crítico que merece, la Gaceta de Guatemala en su tercera serie (1797-1807) se puede considerar como uno de los periódicos más importantes de la Hispanoamérica colonial. Experimentó en particular una actividad traductiva importante, gracias a la presencia de un grupo de individuos excepcionales procedentes de horizontes sociales, geográficos y académicos diversos, pero hermanados por una inquietud intelectual común y por una preocupación por la mejora social y económica no solo del Reino (que iba desde Chiapas a Costa Rica), sino también de la Nación española. A pesar de la importante censura por parte de las autoridades, los editores de la Gaceta y sus colaboradores tuvieron acceso directa e indirectamente a una cantidad considerable de obras extranjeras, y lograron incorporar un gran número de traducciones en diferentes modalidades (traducciones literales, resúmenes, paráfrasis de fragmentos o textos más amplios). El rastreo minucioso de esta tercera serie ha permitido identificar y caracterizar una actividad traductiva tan rica como variada, dando luces sobre el dinamismo intelectual de esta región centroamericana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".