MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Study of Intravenous Midazolam and Flumazenil in Adult New Zealand White—Californian Rabbits (<i>Oryctolagus cuniculus</i>)

2021· article· en· W3133706563 on OpenAlexafffund
Frédérik Rousseau‐Blass, Alastair E. Cribb, Francis Beaudry, Daniel Pang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsFlumazenilMidazolamMedicineAnesthesiaRighting reflexSedationPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsSalineBenzodiazepinePharmacologyReflexInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

receptor antagonist, is commonly used in rabbits to shorten sedation or postanesthetic recovery after benzodiazepine administration. However, no combined pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data are available to guide its administration in this species. In a prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study design, the efficacy of IV flumazenil (FLU; 0.05 mg/kg) or saline control (SAL; equal volume) to reverse the loss of righting reflex (LORR) induced by IV midazolam (1.2 mg/kg) was investigated in 15 New Zealand white rabbits (2.73 to 4.65 kg, 1 y old). Rabbits were instrumented with arterial (central auricular artery) and venous (marginal auricular vein) catheters. After baseline blood sampling, IV midazolam was injected (T0). Flumazenil or saline (FLU/SAL) was injected 30 s after LORR. Arterial blood samples were collected at 1 and 3 min after midazolam injection, and at 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45 and 60 min after injection with flumazenil. Plasma samples for midazolam, 1-OH-midazolam and flumazenil were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and the time to return of righting reflex (ReRR) was compared between groups (Wilcoxon test). FLU terminal half-life, plasma clearance and volume of distribution were 26.3 min [95%CI: 23.3 to 29.3], 18.74 mL/min/kg [16.47 to 21.00] and 0.63 L/kg [0.55 to 0.71], respectively. ReRR was 25 times faster in rabbits treated with FLU (23 [8 to 44] s) compared with SAL (576 [130 to 1141] s; 95%CI [425 to 914 s]). Return of sedation (lateral recumbency) occurred in both groups (7/13 in FLU; 12/13 in SAL) with return of LORR in a few animals (4/13 in FLU; 7/13 in SAL) at 1540 [858 to 2328] s. In the population and anesthesia protocol studied, flumazenil quickly and reliably reversed sedation induced by midazolam injection. However, the potential return of sedation after flumazenil administration warrants careful monitoring in the recovery period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal ScienceSame topicVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaFrench-language works237,207