MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134274028 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.234

A236 LINACLOTIDE IS NOT DETECTABLE IN BREAST MILK OF LACTATING WOMEN: AN OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 1 STUDY

2021· article· en· W3134274028 on OpenAlexaff
Neil E. Crittenden, Danielle McGeeney, Yehudith Assouline-Dayan, Katerine Boutros, M Syrzycka, Wilmin Bartolini, Ramesh Boinpally, Christopher N. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryABB (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast milkDosingPharmacokineticsConstipationLactationBreastfeedingAdverse effectInternal medicineGastroenterologyPregnancyPediatricsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Linaclotide (LIN) is a guanylate cyclase-C agonist approved to treat adults with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). As LIN is a 14-amino acid peptide, no absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is expected following oral administration. However, LIN levels in human breast milk have not been determined. Aims To determine the levels of LIN and its active metabolite, MM-419447, excreted in breast milk after multiple once-daily doses of LIN (72 µg, 145 μg, or 290 μg) in lactating women. Methods This was a multicenter, open-label, multidose, Phase 1, milk-only lactation study (NCT02220348) in lactating women aged 18–45 years who were actively breastfeeding or pumping for ≥4 weeks and were already taking LIN 72 μg, 145 μg, or 290 μg therapeutically for IBS-C or CIC. Participants continued their LIN dose once daily for the 3 study days, with breast milk extractions at −1 to 0 hours (pre-dose) on Day 1 and −1 to 0 hours and 0–2, 2–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–16, and 16–24 hours after dosing on Day 3. The pharmacokinetic endpoints were the cumulative amount of LIN and MM-419447 and the percentage dose of LIN excreted into the breast milk over the dosing interval. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. The study has institutional review board approval. Results Seven women were enrolled in the study (IBS-C, n=1; CIC, n=6) and received LIN (72 μg, n=5; 145 μg, n=1; and 290 μg, n=1). Mean age was 28 (range: 19–35), mean weight was 70 kg (standard deviation [SD]: 12 kg), and mean body mass index was 26 kg/m2 (SD: 4 kg/m2); the majority were white (n=6). Concentrations of LIN and MM-419447 in breast milk samples were below the quantitation limits (<0.25 ng/mL and <1.00 ng/mL, respectively) at all time points for all participants. Cumulative exposure for each dose was 216 μg (72 μg dose), 435 μg (145 μg dose), and 870 μg (290 μg dose). One treatment-emergent AE was reported (mild rash). Conclusions The data collected in this study provide no evidence that breastfeeding infants receive LIN or MM-419447 through breast milk as their concentrations were below the quantitation limit following multiple once-daily doses of LIN 72 μg, 145 μg, or 290 μg. Funding Agencies This study was sponsored by Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland (prior to acquisition by AbbVie Inc.). Writing and editorial assistance were provided to the authors by Stephanie J. Rippon, MBio, Jane Beck, MA, and Rebecca Fletcher, BA(Hons), of Complete HealthVizion, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA and funded by Allergan plc (prior to acquisition by AbbVie Inc.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207