PAT solutions to monitor adsorption of Tetanus Toxoid with aluminum adjuvants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The focus of this study was to examine the small-scale adsorption process of Tetanus Toxoid (TT) as a model protein antigen to aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) and aluminum oxyhydroxide (AlOOH) adjuvants with real-time monitoring by in-line ReactIR™, ParticleTrack™ based on Focused Beam Reflectance Measurement (FBRM) and EasyViewer™ probes. The adsorption process of AlPO4 and AlOOH with TT using was monitored in the small-scale reactors. Conformational changes in TT were monitored using in-line infrared probe ReactIR, whereas particle formation associated with protein adsorption were measured by particle size, count, and imaging tools, such as ParticleTrack with FBRM and EasyViewer probes. ParticleTrack distribution results and kinetic measurements were also supported by observations made using EasyViewer. In addition to EasyMax, BioBLU reactor was also used for the adsorption experiments. ReactIR with ATR-Fiber probe was effectively able to monitor adsorption progress of TT to AlOOH and to AlPO4. ReactIR, EasyViewer, and ParticleTrack provided detailed mechanistic and kinetic information for reaction of TT with AlPO4 and AlOOH. These in-situ measurements revealed a possible multi-step process for TT to AlPO4 which may be an indication of antigen adsorption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".