Pharmacokinetic variability of factor VIII concentrates in Chinese pediatric patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Importance The use of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates under pharmacokinetic (PK) guidance has become the main approach for treatment of hemophilia. However, limited PK research has been conducted in Chinese pediatric patients. Objective To investigate the PK parameters of various FVIII concentrates in Chinese pediatric patients. Methods Seventy‐nine patients were enrolled (28 treated with Kogenate FS®, 23 treated with Advate ®, and 28 treated with GreenMono™). All enrolled patients participated in single‐dose PK analysis after at least a 3‐day washout period. Blood samples were collected predose, as well as at 1 h, 9 h, 24 h, and 48 h after infusion; FVIII levels were measured using a one‐stage clotting assay. von Willebrand Factor Antigen (VWF:Ag) levels and blood types were also determined. PK parameters were evaluated by WAPPS‐Hemo. Results Mean values of terminal elimination half‐life time (t1/2) for the Kogenate FS®, Advate®, and GreenMono™ FVIII groups were 12.24 h, 10.18 h, and 9.62 h; median clearance values were 4.16, 6.23, and 5.11 mL·kg−1·h−1; and median in vivo recovery values were 1.97, 1.55, and 1.61 IU/dL per IU/kg. Longer t1/2, higher in vivo recovery, and lower clearance were observed in patients with higher VWF:Ag level who were treated with recombinant concentrates. Interpretation Chinese pediatric patients with hemophilia had FVIII PK characteristics similar to those previously observed in non‐Chinese children, including large variation among individuals. VWF:Ag level and FVIII brand were associated with differences in FVIII PK. Thus, PK‐guided dosing should be used to optimize individualized therapy in Chinese children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".