شرائع سابقہ اور وضعی قوانین کی موجودگی میں اسلام کی ضرورت و افادیت اور امتیازات
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Humans are a social being, social beneficiary and society oriented. They are in need of such a law that can harmonize temporal and spiritual aspects of their lives; protect their honour, lives and property; declare rights and duties of every individual to organize social life with mutual trust, cooperation and sence of sacrifice; and make individuals morally sound enough to make positive contributions in cultivation of virtues and eradication of evils in order to develop an ideal and a balanced society. This article has been written to trace out among the three contemporary laws (former shariahs, statutory law and Islamic law) which one has the capability to fulfill and satisfy the above mentioned demands of human beings at large. This article aslo finds out the limitations and lacks of former shariahs and statutory law; and explores that only Islamic law can address and resolve all existing problems, newly born issues and the challenges of rapidly varying time and age. An analytical and comparative study of former shariahs, statutory law and Islamic law led to the conclusion that only Islamic law has the capability to address all problems and issues of modern age, what human beings face in varying situations and circumstances with the passage of time; and It also gives comprehensive solutions to these issues, as the humanity is the pivot of Islam law
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it