MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154790864 · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1

A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)

2021· article· en· W3154790864 on OpenAlexafffund
Akash Sharma, Nguyen Tran Minh Duc, Tai Luu Lam Thang, Nguyen Hai Nam, Sze Jia Ng, Kirellos Said Abbas, Nguyen Tien Huy, Ana Marušić, Christine Paul, Janette Kwok, Juntra Karbwang, Chiara de Waure, Frances J. Drummond, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Erik Taal, Joeri Vermeulen, Gillian Lee, Adam Gyedu, Martin L. Verra, Évelyne Jacqz-Aigrain, Wouter K. G. Leclercq, Simo Salminen, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Barbara Mintzes, Sergi Lozano, Ulrich S. Tran, Mitsuaki Matsui, Mohammad Karamouzian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of General Internal Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersKeele UniversityUniversity of TokyoOttawa Hospital Research Institute
KeywordsMedicineChecklistMEDLINEFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.323
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.439
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3230.439
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0230.012
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0070.010
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.444
GPT teacher head0.589
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2,098
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of General Internal MedicineSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207