MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157174551 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab048.002

A Phase 3 Trial in Participants With Obesity Due to Bardet-Biedl Syndrome or Alström Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety of the Melanocortin 4 Receptor Agonist Setmelanotide

2021· article· en· W3157174551 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Haws, Karine Clément, Hélène Dollfus, Joan C. Han, Andrea M. Haqq, Gabriel Ángel Martos‐Moreno, Robert S. Mittleman, Murray Stewart, Matt Webster, Jack A. Yanovski, Guojun Yuan, Jesús Argente

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBody mass indexInternal medicineClinical endpointObesityPediatricsRandomized controlled trialPlaceboConfidence intervalWeight lossEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: This randomized Phase 3 trial evaluated the effect of setmelanotide, a melanocortin 4 receptor agonist, on weight loss, hunger reduction, and safety outcomes in individuals (aged ≥6 years) with obesity and a genetically confirmed diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) or Alström syndrome (AS), conditions believed to disrupt hypothalamic leptin-melanocortin signaling. Methods: For inclusion, obesity was defined as body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (in those aged ≥16 years) or weight >97th percentile (in those aged 6–15 years). Individuals were randomized and received setmelanotide or placebo for 14 weeks, followed by open-label setmelanotide so that all participants received at least 1 year of drug. Body weight, height, hunger scores, and treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants (≥12 years) who achieved ≥10% reduction in body weight from baseline after 52 weeks of treatment. For statistical analysis, the primary endpoint had binomial proportions calculated for each of the 100 multiple imputed data sets, which were combined using Rubin’s Rule to compare against the null hypothesis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values. Efficacy analyses (including change in body weight, body mass index Z score, and hunger) were conducted in participants ≥12 years old at baseline. Safety analyses were conducted in all participants. Results: A total of 38 individuals with BBS (n=32) or AS (n=6) were enrolled. Five participants <12 years and 2 participants ≥12 years who discontinued before receiving active therapy were not included in the primary analysis. The prespecified significance cut points for the primary and key secondary endpoints were met. After ~52 weeks of setmelanotide, 34.5% (95% CI, 17.5%-51.6%; P=0.0024) of participants achieved ≥10% reduction in body weight from baseline. All observed responders had BBS. Mean ± SD percent change in body weight from baseline was −6.2% ± 8.6% (P<0.0001). In participants with BBS aged ≤17 years (n=14), mean ± SD percent change in body mass index Z score from baseline was −24.5% ± 22.3%. Mean ± SD percent Job #11307-1 1/27/2021Haws BBS AS Phase 3 ENDO 2021 EncorePage 2 change in maximal daily hunger score (based on participant responses to scoring their “most” hunger during the day) from baseline was −30.8% ± 25.0% (P<0.0001); 60.2% (95% CI, 35.3%-85.1%; P<0.0001) of participants achieved ≥25% reduction in weekly average daily hunger score from baseline. Common AEs included skin hyperpigmentation (57.9%), injection site erythema (44.7%), and nausea (34.2%). There was 1 serious treatment-related AE of anaphylactic reaction that occurred in a participant receiving placebo. Conclusions: In this Phase 3 trial in patients with BBS and AS, setmelanotide was associated with significant body weight and hunger reduction, with responses being greater in individuals with BBS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207