Results From an Open-Label Extension of the Phase 2 Dose Finding Study of Once Weekly Somatrogon vs Daily Genotropin in Pediatric Patients With Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Somatrogon, a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone, is being developed as a once weekly treatment for pediatric patients (pts) with GHD. A phase 2, 12 month study (NCT01592500) in pts with GHD showed that weekly somatrogon at 0.66 mg/kg/week had similar efficacy and safety to daily Genotropin. Pts who completed 12 months of treatment could be enrolled into an open-label extension (OLE). Aims: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term exposure to somatrogon in pediatric pts with GHD who continued in the OLE for up to an additional 5 years. Methods: Methods for the main phase 2 study were published previously (Zelinska et al, 2017), in which 53 pts were randomized to 1 of 3 weekly somatrogon dose cohorts (0.25, 0.48, and 0.66 mg/kg/week) or the daily Genotropin cohort (0.24 mg/kg/week) for 12 months. After the main study (Periods I/II), 48 pts who consented to participate continued in the OLE, consisting of 3 periods: Period III=12 additional months at original somatrogon dose (Genotropin recipients randomized to 1 of the 3 somatrogon dose regimens); Period IV=subsequent years 2-4 with all pts receiving somatrogon at 0.66 mg/kg/week; Period V=ongoing, with pts transitioned from the vial to a pre-filled pen device at the same somatrogon dose (0.66 mg/kg/week). Data up to 1 year of Period V are reported. Results: Overall subject retention in different periods of this long-term study ranged from 87.5% to 97.7%. 39 pts (81.3%) reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in intensity and most were classified as unrelated to study treatment. 3 pts (6.3%) reported at least 1 serious adverse event (SAE); most SAEs were considered unrelated to study treatment, except for 1 instance of scoliosis. At the end of Period III, the mean annual height velocity (HV) was similar for the 0.25 and 0.48 mg/kg/week dose cohorts (7.73±1.89 and 7.54±1.28 cm/year, respectively) but was higher in the 0.66 mg/kg/week dose cohort (8.81±1.12 cm/year), consistent with the results of the main study. The HV at Periods IV and V showed sustained growth response. Height SDS showed consistent improvement and near normalization of height for age and gender after up to 6 years on somatrogon, irrespective of initial cohort assignment; height SDS at baseline of the main study was -3.98±1.22 and was well within the normal range at -0.69±0.87 at the end of Year 1 in Period V. IGF-1 SDS values remained above baseline and were maintained within the therapeutic target range with weekly somatrogon treatment at all time points in all OLE periods. Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were reported in 18 pts, of which 10 pts had ADAs in the main study. The presence of ADAs did not impact efficacy or safety. Conclusions: Somatrogon administered once weekly for up to 5 years after the main study was generally well tolerated and participants showed sustained improvement in annual HV, height SDS, and delta height SDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".