Genome-wide association study between copy number variants and hoof health traits in Holstein dairy cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies based on SNP have been completed for multiple traits in dairy cattle; however, copy number variants (CNV) could add genomic information that has yet to be harnessed. The objectives of this study were to identify CNV in genotyped Holstein animals and assess their association with hoof health traits using deregressed estimated breeding values as pseudophenotypes. A total of 23,256 CNV comprising 1,645 genomic regions were identified in 5,845 animals. Fourteen genomic regions harboring structural variations, including 9 deletions and 5 duplications, were associated with at least 1 of the studied hoof health traits. This group of traits included digital dermatitis, interdigital dermatitis, heel horn erosion, sole ulcer, white line lesion, sole hemorrhage, and interdigital hyperplasia; no regions were associated with toe ulcer. Twenty candidate genes overlapped with the regions associated with these traits including SCART1, NRXN2, KIF26A, GPHN, and OR7A17. In this study, an effect on infectious hoof lesions could be attributed to the PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma) gene. Almost all genes detected in association with noninfectious hoof lesions could be linked to known metabolic disorders. The knowledge obtained considering information of associated CNV to the traits of interest in this study could improve the accuracy of estimated breeding values. This may further increase the genetic gain for these traits in the Canadian Holstein population, thus reducing the involuntary animal losses due to lameness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".