MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165229010 · doi:10.1002/anie.202105253

Programmable RNA <i>N</i><sup>1</sup>‐Methyladenosine Demethylation by a Cas13d‐Directed Demethylase

2021· article· en· W3165229010 on OpenAlexaff
Shanshan Xie, Hao Jin, Hong Zheng, Yongxia Chang, Ying Liao, Zhang Ye, Tianhua Zhou, Yang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsDemethylaseDemethylationN6-MethyladenosineChemistryBiochemistryMethyltransferaseMethylationDNAEpigeneticsDNA methylationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract N 1 ‐methyladenosine (m 1 A) is a prevalent and reversible RNA modification, which plays a crucial role in the regulation of RNA fate and gene expression. However, the lack of tools to precisely manipulate m 1 A sites in specific transcripts has hindered efforts to clarify the association between a specific m 1 A‐modified transcript and its phenotypic outcomes. Here we develop a CRISPR‐Cas13d‐based tool called re engineered m 1 A mo dification v alid er aser (termed “REMOVER”) for targeted m 1 A demethylation of a specific transcript. The catalytically inactive RfxCas13d (dCasRx) is fused to the m 1 A demethylase ALKBH3, and the dCasRx‐ALKBH3 fusion protein can mediate potent demethylation of m 1 A‐modified RNAs. We further find that REMOVER can specifically demethylate m 1 A of MALAT1 and PRUNE1 RNAs, thereby significantly increasing their stability. Our study establishes REMOVER as a tool for targeted RNA demethylation of specific m 1 A‐modified transcripts, which enables further elucidation of the relationship between m 1 A modification of specific transcripts and their phenotypic outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207