MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3170893157 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzab049_038

Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Deficiency Reduces Brain Microglia in Zebrafish During Embryonic Development and Is Not Corrected by Folic Acid

2021· article· en· W3170893157 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Simonian, Emanuela Pannia, Rola Hammoud, Xiucheng Cui, Ruslan Kubant, Brandi Wasek, Terry Bottiglieri, James J. Dowling, Ramil R. Noche, G. Harvey Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishMicrogliaBiologyMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductaseMorpholinoCell biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsImmunologyGeneAlleleInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuronal development and function is dependent on the interaction between the central nervous system and immune system. Microglia are resident macrophages of the brain critical for regulating neuronal activity during embryonic development. 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5MTHF), the bioactive folate form, is essential for fetal brain development and immune function. Common variants in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), required for conversion of folic acid (FA) to 5-MTHF, limits its production. High dose FA supplementation is recommended but high FA may have the converse effect of reducing MTHFR activity. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of mthfr deficiency and its interaction with FA during embryonic development on microglia in a zebrafish model. The mthfr gene in zebrafish was disrupted using two CRISPR mutagenesis methods. A set of 4 guide RNAs (gRNAs) + cas9 protein or cas9 alone (control) were injected to assay F0 zebrafish, or 2 gRNAs + cas9 mRNA were used to induce a germline mutation. To visualize macrophages at 4 days post fertilization (dpf) in live zebrafish, the transgenic mpeg1: mcherry line was used. In a subset of embryos, FA was added at 0, 50, 75, or 100- μM from 0–4dpf. At 4dpf, live neutral red staining for microglia was performed and the number in the optic tectum was quantified. 5MTHF, s-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and s-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) were assayed in whole zebrafish at 5dpf. In vivo imaging revealed a reduction in macrophage number (∼30%, P < 0.001) in the head region of mthfr disrupted zebrafish, but not in the periphery. mthfr zebrafish also had less microglia compared to controls (15%, P < 0.001). These changes were associated with lower 5MTHF (90%, P < 0.0001) and SAM: SAH (∼50%, P < 0.001) at 5dpf indicative of lower methylation potential. Exposure with FA did not correct the phenotype and at 100µM FA, control zebrafish also showed a decrease in microglia similar to mthfr zebrafish, confirming inhibitory effects of the high FA dose. mthfr deficiency reduces microglia in zebrafish but supplementation with FA does not prevent and may exacerbate the negative effects. The 5MTHF form of folate may be a better alternative to FA for brain health in patients with underlying genetic conditions. Supported by CIHR-INMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in Nutrition→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→