MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171015793 · doi:10.1139/gen-2021-0019

Gynogenetic diploids, tetraploids, or octoploids, and a path to polyploidy in anuran amphibians

2021· article· en· W3171015793 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
James P. Bogart

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of GuelphMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsPloidyBiologyPolyploidHylaChromosomeTunicateKaryotypeGeneticsTree frogZoologyBotanyEvolutionary biologyGeneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unreduced gametes have been implicated in the evolution of polyploid species of plants and animals and are normally produced by female anuran amphibians. Such eggs may initiate the evolution of polyploid species that have arisen independently in several anuran families. Polyploid females could also produce unreduced eggs that might lead to species with higher ploidy levels, or their eggs may develop gynogenetically to reduce the ploidy level. Diploid Hyla chrysoscelis (2n = 24) and tetraploid H. versicolor (4n = 48) are sibling cryptic species of North American grey treefrogs. Artificial crosses using H. versicolor females and genetically distant diploid males were performed to produce haploid H. versicolor and to assess the production of unreduced eggs in this tetraploid species. Gynogenetic diploid (haploid H. versicolor), allotriploid, gynogenetic tetraploid, allopentaploid, autohexaploid, and gynogenetic octoploid tadpoles were confirmed using chromosome counts from tadpole tail tip squashes. The transformation and survival of different ploidies varied. Gynogenetic diploids transformed but expressed aspects of haploid syndrome and died before or shortly after transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207