MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174070807 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2028631

Daratumumab-Based Treatment for Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis

2021· article· en· W3174070807 on OpenAlexaff
Efstathios Kastritis, Giovanni Palladini, Monique C. Minnema, Ashutosh Wechalekar, Arnaud Jaccard, Hans C. Lee, Vaishali Sanchorawala, Simon Gibbs, Peter Mollee, Christopher P. Venner, Jin Lu, Stefan Schönland, Moshe E. Gatt, Kenshi Suzuki, Kihyun Kım, M. Teresa Cibeira, Meral Beksaç, Edward N. Libby, Jason Valent, Vânia Hungria, Sandy W. Wong, Michael Rosenzweig, Naresh Bumma, Antoine Huart, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos, Divaya Bhutani, Adam Waxman, Stacey Goodman, Jeffrey A. Zonder, Selay Lam, Kevin Song, Timon Hansen, Wilfried Roeloffzen, Krzysztof Jamroziak, Fiona Kwok, Chihiro Shimazaki, Jin Seok Kim, Edvan Crusoé, Tahamtan Ahmadi, NamPhuong Tran, Xiang Qin, Sandra Y. Vasey, Brenda Tromp, Jordan M. Schecter, Brendan M. Weiss, Sen Hong Zhuang, Jessica Vermeulen, Giampaolo Merlini, Raymond L. Comenzo

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaLondon Health Sciences CentreVancouver General HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersJanssen Research and DevelopmentEuropean Hematology Association
KeywordsDaratumumabMedicineAL amyloidosisInternal medicineAmyloidosisGastroenterologyBortezomibSurgeryMultiple myelomaImmunologyImmunoglobulin light chainAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils of light chains produced by clonal CD38+ plasma cells. Daratumumab, a human CD38-targeting antibody, may improve outcomes for this disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis to receive six cycles of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or with subcutaneous daratumumab followed by single-agent daratumumab every 4 weeks for up to 24 cycles (daratumumab group). The primary end point was a hematologic complete response. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 11.4 months. The percentage of patients who had a hematologic complete response was significantly higher in the daratumumab group than in the control group (53.3% vs. 18.1%) (relative risk ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.1; P<0.001). Survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression favored the daratumumab group (hazard ratio for major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.02). At 6 months, more cardiac and renal responses occurred in the daratumumab group than in the control group (41.5% vs. 22.2% and 53.0% vs. 23.9%, respectively). The four most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (13.0% in the daratumumab group and 10.1% in the control group), pneumonia (7.8% and 4.3%, respectively), cardiac failure (6.2% and 4.8%), and diarrhea (5.7% and 3.7%). Systemic administration-related reactions to daratumumab occurred in 7.3% of the patients. A total of 56 patients died (27 in the daratumumab group and 29 in the control group), most due to amyloidosis-related cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone was associated with higher frequencies of hematologic complete response and survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ANDROMEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03201965.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations668
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207