MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Renal Collecting Duct GSK3ß Deletion Affects Response To AVP By Reducing Adenylate Cyclase Activity

2009· article· en· W3174287136 on OpenAlexaff
Reena Rao, Satish Patel, Matthew Breyer, Harris Raymond

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon Transport and Channel Regulation
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyAquaporin 2ReabsorptionForskolinUrine osmolalityGSK-3Adenylate kinaseVasopressinChemistryKidneyBiologyKinaseMedicineBiochemistryStimulationReceptorWater channel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) is potently inhibited by lithium, a common treatment for bipolar disorders, which impairs urinary concentrating ability in 20‐30% of patients. To examine if GSK3ß is crucial for regulating vasopressin (AVP) dependent water reabsorption in the renal collecting duct (CD), we developed CD specific GSK3ß knockout mice (GSK3ß‐CD null). These mice had lower urine osmolality, renal aquaporin 2 (AQP2) mRNA and protein levels following water deprivation or dDAVP treatment, compared to wild type (WT) mice. dDAVP and forskolin induced cAMP generation was lower in the GSK3ß‐CD null mice and GSK3ß inhibitor treated WT mice or IMCD cells. We measured the renal AC activity in membrane preparation from WT and GSK3ß ‐CD null mice. dDAVP or forskolin induced AC activity in GSK3ß‐CD null group was reduced by up to 50% and 40% respectively compared to the WT group. Over 68% suppression of AC activity was observed in WT membranes treated with SB216763. These studies show for the first time that GSK3ß inhibition or deletion leads to lower cAMP generation due to reduced AC activity, which could be responsible for low AQP2 expression and impaired response to AVP in the GSK3ß‐CD null mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicIon Transport and Channel RegulationFrench-language works237,207