MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mitochondrial biogenesis elicited by chronic contractile activity with mTORC1 inhibition

2011· article· en· W3175888909 on OpenAlexaff
Heather N. Carter, David A. Hood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmTORC1Mitochondrial biogenesisBiogenesisCell biologyChemistryMitochondrionBiologySignal transductionBiochemistryPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic contractile activity (CCA) enriches the mitochondrial content of skeletal muscle, and this adaptation requires an increased expression of nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial proteins (NUGEMPs). The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) has been implicated in regulating the expression of NUGEMPs by linking the co-activator PGC-1α to the transcription factor YY1. We wished to ascertain if mTORC1 was required for CCA-induced mitochondrial biogenesis. C2C12 myotubes were subjected to CCA (3 hours/day, 4 days) in the presence of 1nM rapamycin, an mTORC1 inhibitor, or DMSO. CCA increased mitochondrial content, as reflected by cytochrome oxidase (COX) activity. This adaptation was also evident in the presence of rapamycin. Indeed, mTORC1 inhibition led to an increase in COX activity in both the absence (28%) and presence (20%) of CCA. Surprisingly, the mTORC1 component raptor, as well as YY1, were both significantly elevated due to mTORC1 inhibition. However, CCA had no effect on raptor levels, but increased YY1 expression by 1.8-fold. State III respiration declined in rapamycin-treated cells, but this was not observed in the presence of CCA, suggesting that CCA recovered mitochondrial function. These data suggest that mTORC1 may be a negative regulator of NUGEMPs, and that the inhibition of mTORC1 does not blunt CCA-induced mitochondrial biogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→