MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reduced Extracellular [Ca <sup>2+</sup> ] Increases the Sensitivity of Mouse EDL and Soleus to the K <sup>+</sup> ‐Induced Force Depression: Implication for the Increased Sensitivity of Hyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis Muscles to Calcium Levels

2019· article· en· W3176923522 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jean‐Marc Renaud, Francine Uwera

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryInternal medicineSalbutamolEndocrinologyExtracellularSoleus muscleCalciumBiophysicsSkeletal muscleBiochemistryMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis (HyperKPP) is a disease of altered skeletal muscle excitability due to missense mutations in the skeletal muscle Na + channel (Na V 1.4). It is primarily characterized by myotonic discharges between and during periods of paralysis that mainly affect limb muscles. The paralysis is induced by large membrane depolarizations associated with the increase in Na + influx and accumulation of extracellular [K + ] during the myogenic discharge. Patients can be alleviated of their paralysis by taking salbutamol and/or ingesting Ca 2+ . While salbutamol mechanism of action involves an improved resting membrane potential and an increase in Ca 2+ release, the effect of Ca 2+ is not well understood except that a large increase in extracellular [Ca 2+ ] e ([Ca 2+ ] e ) reduces the K + ‐induced force depression. The objective of this study was therefore to test the hypothesis that a reduced [Ca 2+ ] e increases the extent of the K + ‐induced force depression and reduces the salbutamol‐induced increase in force at elevated [K + ] e . A decrease in [Ca 2+ ] e from 2.4 mM to 0.3 mM had no effect on the tetanic force of both wild type mouse EDL and soleus when [K + ] e was at the normal 4.7 mM. However, it significantly shifted the tetanic force‐[K + ] e relationship to lower [K + ] e . At 2.4 mM Ca 2+ and 4.7 mM K + , HyperKPP EDL and soleus generated as much tetanic force as their wild type counterpart. However, decreases in [Ca 2+ ] e to 1.3 and 0.3 mM significantly reduced tetanic force at 4.7 mM and caused large and significant shift of the tetanic force‐[K + ] e relationship to lower [K + ] e . Lowering [Ca 2+ ] e did not affect the efficacy of salbutamol to increase tetanic force when it had been depressed by an increase in [K + ] e in either wild type or HyperKPP muscles. Considering that at 4.7 mM K + , several HyperKPP EDL and soleus fibers are depolarized and that the effect of lower [Ca 2+ ] e occurred when the cell membrane is depolarized by increases in [K + ] e , it is suggested that the increased sensitivity of HyperKPP muscles to Ca 2+ is primarily because of a large number of fibers with depolarized cell membrane even when [K + ] e is at its normal value of 4.7 mM. Support or Funding Information This study was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicIon channel regulation and function→French-language works237,207→