MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract LB094: KisoBody: Development and pre-clinical assessment of a novel multispecific antibody platform

2021· article· en· W3181312404 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Wargachuk, Dominic Hou, Claire Bonfils, Nicolas Morin, Milica Krstic, Yun Cui, Jacynthe L. Toulouse, Donald Gagné, Elijus Undzys, Alex Zhou, Emily Chen, Ashwani Gupta, Luis daCruz, David Young

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyAntibodyCancerComputational biologyPharmacokineticsCancer researchBiologyPharmacologyMedicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Monoclonal antibody therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by addressing a variety of mechanisms from interfering with signaling to checkpoint inhibition. Bispecific antibodies double the number of therapeutic mechanisms addressed by each antibody to improve clinical outcomes. A substantial advance in therapeutic antibodies is increasing the number of mechanisms addressable per molecule to three or beyond to improve efficacy and safety. The KisoBody platform was developed to address the need for multispecific antibodies that are highly customizable and easy to manufacture. The KisoBody platform is based on heavy chain only antibodies (VHH) in conjunction with human Fc. The compact stable nature of VHH antibodies make them ideal building blocks for multidomain antibodies. The overall size of the KisoBody starts at approximately 140 kDa. The KisoBody can be assembled with wild type Fc domain to facilitate large scale manufacturing processes and maintain clinically relevant pharmacokinetics. Expression of several KisoBodies in CHO cells produced titers ranging from 2.3 to 4.4 g/L cell culture. Conventional two-step purification with protein A affinity chromatography following by size-exclusion chromatography resulted in proteins with purities of between 95.5 % and 99.5%. The pharmacokinetics of the KisoBody are consistent with that of canonical monoclonal antibodies of around 200 hours half-life in mice. The modular design of the KisoBody platform leads to very straightforward customization of the tumor targeting domains and the domains used for recruitment of other cell types, or to interfere with other cancer functions of therapeutic significance. The trispecific KisoBody presented here, KBI-436 has the ability to target tumor cells through binding to dopamine receptor 2 while simultaneously engaging the immune system through checkpoint inhibitors. The three VHH binding domains engage multiple mechanisms of action. The binding activity of the individual domains was tested in vitro. KBI-436 is easily manufactured using CHO cells, yielding a titer of greater than 3.5 g/L cell culture. Following a purification, a purity of greater than 98 % was achieved. The anti-tumor effects of KBI-436 were demonstrated in vivo in a number of human PBMC co-engraftment murine models of human SCLC. This molecule is being advanced to clinical trials in dopamine receptor positive solid tumors. Citation Format: Richard Wargachuk, Dominic Hou, Claire Bonfils, Nicolas Morin, Shugang Yao, Milica Krstic, Yun Cui, Jacynthe L. Toulouse, Donald Gagné, Elijus Undzys, Alex Zhou, Emily Chen, Ashwani Gupta, Luis DaCruz, David Young. KisoBody: Development and pre-clinical assessment of a novel multispecific antibody platform [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB094.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.298
GPT teacher head0.566
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→