MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182504257 · doi:10.1007/s10570-021-04061-9

Valorization of decationized newsprint to levulinic acid

2021· article· en· W3182504257 on OpenAlexafffund
Emmanuel Nzediegwu, Guillermo Portillo‐Perez, Marie‐Josée Dumont

Bibliographic record

VenueCellulose · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis for Biomass Conversion
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLevulinic acidSoftwoodNewsprintHardwoodPulp and paper industryHydrolysisRaw materialChemistryYield (engineering)Biomass (ecology)Acid hydrolysisOrganic chemistryHydroxymethylfurfuralMaterials scienceBotanyCatalysisComposite materialAgronomyFurfuralCelluloseEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As of today, most chemical products are fossil-based. The environmental concerns of fossil resources due to their constant misuse have led to the exploration of bio-based alternatives. Biomass comprising industrial and municipal wastes, agricultural residues, forest residues, and natural herbaceous plants can favorably replace fossil fuel to produce chemicals. In this study, softwood and hardwood pulps were used to synthesize levulinic acid. Prior to a dilute acid hydrolysis step, the wood pulps were decationized overnight with 0.2 M HCl. The effects of the major reaction conditions including reaction temperature, time, and HCl concentration on the yield of levulinic acid was studied via a central composite design. Levulinic acid yields from softwood and hardwood pulps reached 50.30 and 68.85 mol%, respectively, at optimum reaction conditions. When newsprints were tested using the optimized parameters for softwood and hardwood conversion, levulinic acid yields of 66.25 and 79.65 mol% were obtained, respectively. A kinetic model was developed to predict the yields of glucose, hydroxymethylfurfural, and levulinic acid from the HCl-pretreated newsprint. The analysis of the kinetic parameters and the results of the response surface methodology experiments provided optimized conditions for levulinic acid production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCelluloseSame topicCatalysis for Biomass ConversionFrench-language works237,207