Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the CD154 Cleavage Site Inhibits CD40-Dependent and -Independent Cleavage of CD154 from the Cell Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to the membrane-bound molecule, soluble CD154 (sCD154) is also detected at high levels in the medium of activated T cells and platelets and in the serum of patients suffering from different inflammatory diseases. This sCD154 is the result of cleavage of the full-length molecule between the glutamic acid residue at position 112 (E112) and methionine at position 113 (M113) and can be derived from the intracellular milieu and from cleavage of cell surface molecules. We have recently reported that substitution of both E112 and M113 by alanine inhibits intracellular and CD40-induced membrane cleavage of CD154 and procures to CD154 an increased biological function as compared with cleavable CD154. Thus, in this study, and in the aim of developing tools inhibiting cleavage of CD154 from the cell surface, we generated a panel of anti-human CD154 mAbs. One of the derived mAbs that did not alter the binding of sCD154 to CD40, named in this study Clone 8 mAb, totally lost its binding activity against cells expressing CD154 mutated at its E112 and M113 residues. Treatment with Clone 8 mAb was shown to completely abolish CD40-dependent and -independent cleavage of CD154 from the cell surface. Our study is highlighting the development and characterization of an innovative therapeutic tool capable of inhibiting the release/cleavage of CD154 from cells and thus maintaining its availability on the cell surface and the high probably of increasing its potency as an activator of CD40-induced responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".