Pharmacokinetics of a once‐daily tacrolimus formulation in first nations and caucasian liver transplant recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patient ethnicity may influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tacrolimus. Because the Canadian First Nations (FN) constitute a large and increasing segment of the liver transplant population, we undertook to determine whether PK differences exist for a once-daily, extended release formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf) in FN compared to Caucasian (CAUC) liver transplant recipients. Following achievement of a steady state with Advagraf, blood samples were drawn at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours for whole blood tacrolimus levels by commercial immunoassay and CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 allele analyses were performed by polymerase chain reactions. Nineteen subjects participated in the study (7 FN and 12 CAUC). The FN cohort had significantly higher AUC (214 ± 48 versus 168 ± 25, P < 0.05), Cmax (16.7 ± 4.4 ng/ml versus 11.3 ± 1.7 ng/ml, P < 0.05), Cmin (6.1 ± 1.0 ng/ml versus 4.7 ± 0.5 ng/ml, P < 0.05) and shorter Tmax (1.6 ± 0.2 hours versus 2.8 ± 0.3 hours, P < 0.05) values than CAUCs. CYP3A4 genotypes were C/C in both cohorts, while the CYP3A5 *1/*3 allele was present in 2/5 FN and 0/9 CAUC. The results of this study indicate that once-daily, extended release Advagraf results in higher blood tacrolimus levels and shorter times to Cmax in FN compared to CAUC liver transplant recipients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".