MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193739886 · doi:10.21608/avmj.2019.168906

MOLECULAR DETECTION OF SALMONELLA AND E. COLI MICROORGANISMS AMONG DAIRY FARMS WITH DETECTION OF VIRULENCE AND ANTIBIOTICS RESISTANCE GENES

2019· article· en· W3193739886 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gihan Mohamed Omer Mohamed, HASSAN EL-SAYED MOHAMED FARAG

Bibliographic record

VenueAssiut Veterinary Medical Journal/Maǧallaẗ Asyūṭ al-ṭibiyyaẗ al-baytariyyaẗ · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAssiut UniversityPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsVirulenceSalmonellaBiologyAntibioticsGeneMicrobiologyAntibiotic resistanceMicroorganismBiotechnologyDairy cattleGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 500 samples, 100 of each milk, feed, swabs from milking equipment (milk tanks), drinking tanks swabs and dairy cows fecal swabs samples were collected from different small herds of apparently or subclinical dairy cattle in El-Kabotti and Bahr El-Baker zone at Port-Said Governorates during the period from September to December 2018. The samples were examined for isolation and identification of Salmonella species and E. coli with studied of their virulence and resistance gens and sequence of some genes. The results revealed that Salmonella species and E. coli could be detected in a percentage of 1.8% and 2.8% respectively from the examined samples. Salmonella isolates from the examined samples were identified biochemically and serological as S. Typhimurium S. Entiriditis and S. saintipaul with a percentage of 66.67% (6/9), 2.22% (2/9) and 11.11% (1/9) respectively, while that of E. coli were O26 (5/14), O119 (2/14), O125 (4/14), O126 (1/14) and O127 (2/14) with a percentage of 35.71%, 14.28%, 28.60%, 7.14% and 14.28% respectively. The isolated strains of Salmonella species (n=9) and E. coli stains (N=14) were investigated for antibiotic susceptibility profile to 10 antibacterial agents by disc diffusion method. The resistances of the isolated Salmonella and E. coli strains were ranged from a various degree of resistances to complete resistances (100%). By using conventional PCR, all Salmonella were harbored InvA, stn and bcfC genes while E. coli were harbored PhoA, TraT and fimH genes. The resistance genes that detected in Salmonella strains were ampC, mphA and aacC while that of E. coli were bltEm, ampC, mphA, Aada1 and aacC. The prevalence of the resistance genes were discussed. DNA sequencing of stn and bcfC genes for Salmonella and TraT and fimH genes for E. coli were discussed and compared with other strains in Gen Bank. The mutations in quinolone-resistance gene were studied by determining regions of the gyrA gene for Salmonella and E. coli. The public health hazards of these microorganisms as well as recommended measures to improve hygiene measures in dairy farms were discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssiut Veterinary Medical Journal/Maǧallaẗ Asyūṭ al-ṭibiyyaẗ al-baytariyyaẗSame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207