Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueNature Methods · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsNational Cancer InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteLudwig Center at HarvardDana-Farber Cancer InstituteSchool of Medicine, Vanderbilt UniversitySchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterJohns Hopkins UniversityBroad InstituteVanderbilt University Medical CenterOregon Health and Science UniversityVanderbilt UniversityDamon Runyon Cancer Research FoundationChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical SchoolNational Science FoundationMassachusetts General HospitalBrigham and Women's HospitalEmory UniversityKlarman Cell Observatory, Broad InstituteUniversity of DundeeNational Institutes of HealthSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsMetadataMultiplexingComputer scienceMicroscopyGenomicsComputational biologyBiologyGenomePathologyWorld Wide WebMedicineGeneGenetics
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.529
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
