The relationship of plasma glutamine to ammonium and of glycine to acid–base balance in propionic acidaemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperammonaemia is a common and serious complication of propionic acidaemia. Treatment of hyperammonaemia with sodium phenylacetate or phenylbutyrate has not been well studied in this disorder. We reviewed the medical records of 5 patients with propionic acidaemia over a 16-year period. We collected information on events where plasma amino acids and ammonium, plasma acids and acid-base balance, or all 3 parameters were obtained simultaneously. All patients were on protein-restricted diet and carnitine throughout the period. In contrast to hyperammonaemia in patients with a urea cycle disorder, plasma glutamine levels were below the normal mean and there was no correlation between plasma ammonium and glutamine levels. The absence of positive correlation between plasma glutamine and ammonium suggests that the routine use of sodium phenylacetate or phenylbutyrate to treat hyperammonaemia in propionic acidaemia should be questioned until further studies are done. Throughout follow-up of our propionic acidaemia patients, we have observed that plasma glycine levels correlated positively with serum bicarbonate. The association of high plasma glycine with good acid-base balance might have a potential role in management and warrants further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".