MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199985489 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdab112.032

SYST-04. TRAM-01: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF TRAMETINIB FOR PATIENTS WITH PEDIATRIC GLIOMA WITH ACTIVATION OF THE MAPK/ERK PATHWAY

2021· article· en· W3199985489 on OpenAlex
Sébastien Perreault, Valérie Larouche, Uri Tabori, Cynthia Hawkins, Sarah Lippé, Benjamin Ellezam, Jean‐Claude Décarie, Luis H. Ospina, Yves Théorêt, Léandra Desjardins, Marie‐Élaine Métras, Serge Sultan, Édith Cantin, Marie-Ève Routhier, Maxime Caru, Stéphanie Vairy, Geneviève Legault, Éric Bouffet, Lucie Lafay‐Cousin, Juliette Hukin, Craig Erker, Nada Jabado

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsIWK FoundationBC Children's HospitalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeHospital for Sick ChildrenAlberta Children's HospitalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrametinibMedicineTolerabilityMAPK/ERK pathwayInternal medicineProgressive diseaseOncologyAdverse effectProgression-free survivalGastroenterologySurgeryDiseaseOverall survivalBiologySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGG) are the most frequent brain tumors in children. It is known that the majority of PLGG have activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway. METHODS This ongoing multicenter phase II trial includes three progressing/refractory PLGG groups: NF1 patients, KIAA1549-BRAF fusion patients and patients with other activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway (excluding V600E). The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate based on RANO criteria after daily oral trametinib administration for 18 cycles, lasting 28 days each. Secondary objectives include the assessment of progression-free survival, tolerability of trametinib, serum levels of trametinib and quality of life evaluation during treatment. RESULTS As of February 12 2021, 50 patients have been enrolled (NF1: n=10; KIAA1549-BRAF fusion: n=31; other: n=9 including 5 patients with FGFR1 alterations). Median age is 8.8 years (range 2.4-25.5). Median follow-up is 17.5 months (range 4.7-28.5). Forty-three patients are evaluable. The overall response includes: 4 partial response (PR) (9%), 18 minor response (MR) (42%), 17 stable disease (40%), 4 progressive disease (9%). Median time to response is 5.5 months (range 2.4-13.8). Median duration of response is 6.1 months (range 0.6-26.5). Progression free survival at 12 months is 79.9% (95% CI 68.5-93.6%) and median progression free survival has not yet been reached. Treatment was discontinued for 30 patients: 16 after completing 18 cycles as planned, 5 for progressive disease, 5 for adverse events, 4 for other reasons. A total of 8 patients progressed after discontinuation of treatment including 6 patients (37.5%) that completed 18 cycles. Five of these patients had achieved minor response prior to discontinuation. CONCLUSION Trametinib is a potentially effective targeted therapy for patients with recurrent/refractory PLGG. Treatment was overall well tolerated. This ongoing trial will continue to gather data on response rate, duration of response and safety of trametinib for PLGG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it