MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201052944 · doi:10.1002/jmri.27929

Reproducibility of Longitudinal Changes in Cortical Thickness Determined by Surface‐Based Morphometry Between Non‐Accelerated and Accelerated <scp>MR</scp> Imaging

2021· article· en· W3201052944 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hidemasa Takao, Shiori Amemiya, Osamu Abe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenentechNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SServierNational Institute on AgingFujirebio EuropePfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBiogenNorman Cousins Center for PsychoneuroimmunologyMerckAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationRocheEisai IncorporatedAbbVieTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyEli Lilly and CompanyGE HealthcareBioClinicaAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
KeywordsReproducibilityMedicineIntraclass correlationNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingLongitudinal studyCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyPathologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Scan acceleration such as parallel imaging reduces scan time, but shorter scan time may reduce the signal-to-noise ratio and affect image quality. The reproducibility of longitudinal changes in the brain structure between non-accelerated and accelerated imaging by surface-based analysis is unclear. PURPOSE: -weighted imaging in the healthy elderly and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Fifty healthy elderly subjects (age = 73 ± 5 years, 29 females, 21 males), 54 MCI patients (age = 71 ± 7 years, 23 females, 31 males), and 8 AD patients (age = 78 ± 6 years, 6 females, 2 males). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo. ASSESSMENT: Longitudinal changes in cortical thickness estimated by the longitudinal stream in FreeSurfer from 2-year interval data, and visual assessment of image quality by three radiologists. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kruskal-Wallis test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Healthy elderly subjects, MCI patients, and AD patients showed different patterns in the ICC maps. For the smoothing of 20 mm full width at half maximum, the mean ICC was 0.45 overall (healthy elderly, 0.33; MCI patients, 0.49; AD patients, 0.31). The within-subject SDs of the symmetrized percent changes were similar between healthy elderly subjects (mean, 1.3%/year) and MCI patients (mean, 1.3%/year) but larger in AD patients (mean, 1.7%/year). Image quality did not significantly differ per group (P = 0.18). DATA CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate the reproducibility of longitudinal changes in cortical thickness measured by surface-based morphometry between non-accelerated and accelerated imaging, and that the reproducibility varies by disease and region. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207