MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3201382684 · doi:10.1002/alz.051871

Results of the first‐in‐human, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 1b study of lumbar intrathecal bolus administrations of antisense oligonucleotide (ISIS 814907; BIIB080) targeting tau mRNA in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease

2021· article· en· W3201382684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine J. Mummery, Candice Junge, Holly Kordasiewicz, Laurence Mignon, Katrina Moore, C. Chris Yun, Tiffany Baumann, Rebecca Crean, Danielle Graham, Ellen Huang, Elena Ratti

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBolus (digestion)PlaceboIntrathecalLumbarAnesthesiaRandomized controlled trialDouble blindSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background ISIS 814907 (BIIB080) is an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) that hybridizes to a complementary nucleotide sequence of mRNA of the human microtubule‐associated protein tau (MAPT) gene, preventing production of tau protein. Accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau is associated with cognitive decline and brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The placebo controlled period of the Phase 1b multiple ascending dose (MAD) study of ISIS 814907 in patients with mild AD is complete and the open‐label long term extension (LTE) is ongoing in the UK, Canada, Germany, Sweden, Netherlands and Finland (EudraCT: 2016‐002713‐22; NCT03186989). Methods The study is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 is the MAD study, comprising a 3‐month Treatment Evaluation (TE) Period and a 6‐month Post‐Treatment (PT) Period. Part 2 is the open‐label LTE, comprising a 12‐month TE Period and a 4‐ or 6‐month PT Period. Four ascending dose cohorts were enrolled sequentially and randomized 3:1 to intrathecal (IT) bolus administrations of ISIS 814907 or placebo. Male or female patients aged 50‐74 years with mild AD and confirmed amyloid positivity (via CSF) at Screening were considered eligible. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability of multiple IT bolus administrations of ISIS 814907. The secondary objective was to evaluate CSF pharmacokinetics (PK). Exploratory objectives include assessment of plasma PK, target engagement and disease biomarkers, genotype and clinical endpoints relevant to AD. Results All subjects (N=46) completed the MAD TE Period and 43 subjects completed the PT Period. All AEs were mild/moderate in severity. No serious AEs occurred in subjects receiving ISIS 814907. Dose‐dependent mean reduction from baseline in CSF total tau and phospho‐tau was observed in the TE period and continued in the PT period. CSF total tau and phospho‐tau reductions were comparable. Conclusions IT bolus administration of multiple ascending doses of ISIS 814907 over 3 months was well‐tolerated in patients with mild AD. The robust lowering of CSF total tau and phospho‐tau warrants further investigation for the treatment of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→