MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3204782972 · doi:10.30683/1927-7229.2021.10.01

Tryptophan Metabolism and Cancer Progression

2021· article· en· W3204782972 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kenneth K. Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
KeywordsMelatoninKynurenineCancer cellCancerAryl hydrocarbon receptorMetastasisBiologyCancer researchReceptorCell growthKynurenine pathwaySignal transductionChemistryTryptophanBiochemistryEndocrinologyTranscription factorAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Intracellular tryptophan (Trp) is catabolized to a large repertoire of metabolites via two major pathways: indoleamine and tryptophan 2, 3-dioxygenases (IDO/TDO) and Trp hydroxylase (TPH) pathways. The catabolites possess diverse biological activities and carry out various physiological functions. Several catabolites such as kynurenine (Kyn) and serotonin promote while melatonin and 5-methoxytryptophan (5-MTP) suppress cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer cell-derived Kyn enhances cancer growth and evasion of immunosurveillance by interacting with cancer cell and immune cell membrane aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AHR), respectively. Serotonin exerts its tumor-promoting activities through type 1 and type 2 serotonin receptors. 5-MTP and melatonin suppress cancer growth and metastasis by common mechanisms, i.e., inhibition of p300 histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and NF-κB activation, and suppression of cyclooxygenase-2 and cytokine transcription. Both metabolites block p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Human cancer tissues express increased levels of IDO, TDO and kynurenine monooxygenase (KMO) which are correlated with reduced patient survival. In summary, cancer Trp metabolism regulates cancer growth and metastasis by complex mechanisms. 5-MTP and melatonin provide valuable lead to develop new drugs for chemo-prevention and adjuvant therapy of cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical OncologySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207