MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206558323

Study of the Molecular Mechanism of W182 in the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle

2020· article· en· W3206558323 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ming Wang, Sijin Chen, Xin Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacteriorhodopsinHalobacterium salinarumRhodopsinChemistryProton transportBiophysicsHalobacteriaceaeHalobacteriumRetinalChromophoreProton pumpMolecular dynamicsPolyeneTransmembrane domainPhotochemistryBiochemistryMembraneBiologyATPaseComputational chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacteriorhodopsin (bR), a seven-transmembrane photoreceptor protein with retinal as the chromophore found in purple membrane of Halobacterium salinarum R1M1, functions as a proton pump. Tryptophan 182 (W182), one of the most conserved aromatic residues within the microbial rhodopsin family proteins, locates in the intracellular side of the retinal binding pocket and plays a very important role in affecting the photocycle and proton pumping activity of bR through the interaction with the retinal polyene chain. In this study, site-directed mutagenesis of W182F and W182A, in combination with in-situ UV-vis absorption spectroscopy, light-induced transient absorption change sepectroscopy, pH titration and molecular dynamics simulations, is employed to elaborate the molecular mechanism the functional role of W182 in the bR photocycle. Our results show that perturbation of W182F to the bR photocycle mainly originates from the disturbance of the retinal binding pocket, while the affect by the mutation of W182A mainly comes from the disruption of the intracellular half-channel of proton translocation pathway. The two mutations have different molecular mechanisms on the effect of proton transport on the extracellular half channel, resulting in a significant difference in the decay of M intermediate state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Microbiology ResearchSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207