MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S744 Risankizumab Induction Therapy Provides Early Symptom Improvements in Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn’s Disease: Results From Two Phase 3 Induction Studies

2021· article· en· W3210922155 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Frédéric Colombel, Stefan Schreiber, Geert D’Haens, Joanne Rizzo, Kristina Kligys, Jenny Griffith, Javier Zambrano, Qian Zhou, Jasmina Kalabic, Florian Rieder, Marla C. Dubinsky, Remo Panaccione

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseAbdominal painGastroenterologyClinical trialQuality of life (healthcare)Randomized controlled trialDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) including stool frequency (SF) and abdominal pain score (APS) are main drivers for disability and quality of life impairment in patients (pts) with Crohn’s disease (CD). We assess symptom improvement beginning at Wk1 with Risankizumab (RZB), an IL-23 p19 inhibitor, in pts with moderate to severe CD in two phase 3 induction studies, ADVANCE and MOTIVATE. Methods: Briefly, 50% of pts in ADVANCE and 100% in MOTIVATE showed prior inadequate response or intolerance to biologic therapy. Pts with moderate to severe CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] of 220–450, Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES CD] ≥6 [≥4 for isolated ileal disease] excluding the narrowing component, and average daily [liquid/very soft] SF ≥4 and/or average daily AP score ≥2) were randomized 2:2:1 (ADVANCE) or 1:1:1 (MOTIVATE) to receive intravenous (IV) RZB 600 mg or 1200 mg, or placebo (PBO) as induction therapy at Wks 0, 4, and 8. Average daily SF and average daily AP scores were calculated from pt diary data. Enhanced clinical response (≥60% decrease in SF and/or ≥ 35% decrease in APS and both not worse than baseline [BL], and/or clinical remission), clinical remission per SF/APS (SF ≤2.8 and APS ≤1), SF remission (SF ≤2.8), AP remission (APS ≤1), and change from BL in SF and APS are reported using non-responder imputation. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for statistical comparisons of RZB dose and PBO. Safety was assessed in pts receiving at least 1 dose of study drug. Results: BL characteristics of pts enrolled in ADVANCE and MOTIVATE were generally well-balanced across treatment groups. A single IV dose of RZB, either 600 mg or 1200 mg, induced rates of enhanced clinical response and clinical remission per SF/APS that differentiated significantly from PBO as early as Wk2 (Table 1). Similarly, significant differences in proportion of pts achieving SF remission or APS remission alone were observed with RZB vs PBO (Table 1). Further, significant improvements from BL in average daily SF and APS were observed as early as Wk1 with RZB treatment (Table 1). No new safety risks were identified and both induction doses of RZB were well tolerated. Conclusion: RZB induction therapy led to early improvements in clinical symptoms of AP and SF with early significant differentiation from placebo in pts with moderate to severe CD. Significant differentiation in clinical response and remission from placebo could be achieved with RZB treatment as early as Wk2.Table 1.: Adverse events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→