MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211643867 · doi:10.7185/gold2021.5977

Geochemical Evaluation of Flowback and Produced Water from Five Hydraulically-Fractured Wells in the Niobrara Formation, Denver-Julesburg Basin, CO, USA: A 228 Day Field Study

2021· article· en· W3211643867 on OpenAlex
Derek Caro, John Kaszuba, Olivia Terry

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGoldschmidt2021 abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinGeochemistryHydrology (agriculture)Formation waterPetroleum engineeringMining engineeringGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemistry of flowback and produced water from unconventional oil and gas wells changes over time. These chemical changes have been attributed to mixing of injected fracturing fluid with water from one or more formations and/or to mineral dissolution/precipitation. Water from five wells in the B-Bench of the Cretaceous Niobrara Formation, Denver-Julesburg Basin, Colorado, USA was produced after injection of alkaline fracturing fluid and a 12 to 30-day shut-in period; production continued for 78 to 228 days. Water samples were periodically analyzed to characterize and determine the origin of these waters and to determine potential geochemical and mineralogic changes to the reservoir. Concentrations of aqueous Ca, Mg, Ba, Sr, Na, Cl, and TDS increased as waters were produced. 18 O enrichment and increasing Br/Cl ratios suggest that formation water originated from evaporated seawater and a single formation water mixed with the injected fracturing fluid; water from a second formation was not evident. The temporal evolution of aqueous Ca, Mg, Ba, Sr, Na, Cl, and TDS in flowback and produced water correlates ( 5-10%) with mixing of formation water and fracturing fluid. Formation water dominated flowback fluid chemistry within a few 100s of barrels of production; water-rock interaction did not influence temporal trends of these constituents. In contrast, concentrations of aqueous Fe, SO 4 , K, and SiO 2 did not increase as the waters were produced; trends of these parameters suggest geochemical reaction of the formation water-fracturing fluid mixture with the rock. Three wells were shut in multiple times; these additional shut-in periods may have induced precipitation of a few tens of kilograms of Fe-bearing solids. Fracturing fluid began to dissolve calcite within the reservoir during early stages of production. However, depressurization and exsolution of dissolved CO 2 in flowback and produced water may have produced 100s of kilograms of calcite scale at near-surface conditions. We find that long-term geochemical evolution (greater than ~30 days) of flowback and produced water from the B-Bench of the Niobrara Formation was dominated by formation water. Alkaline fracturing fluid-mineral reaction in the reservoir was limited, but near-surface calcite scale may be significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it