MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213936528

Molecular Docking and Dynamics of CePNKP Phosphatase Binding to the ss-5-Mer TCCTC

2021· article· en· W3213936528 on OpenAlexaff
Randa Tunalli

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular dynamicsPhosphataseDNA ligaseDNAMODELLERChemistryDocking (animal)BiophysicsCrystallographyEnzymeStereochemistryBiochemistryHomology modelingBiologyComputational chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase (PNKP) is a DNA repair enzyme found in mammals, which recognizes and repairs DNA backbone breaks with 3'-phosphate and 5'-hydroxyl ends. DNA can be damaged by ionizing radiation, chemical agents and enzymatic action. The phosphatase domain of PNKP recognizes the 3'-phosphate group, excises it, and replaces it with a 3'-hydroxyl group, thereby making the 3'-end ready for the action of a ligase that completes the DNA strand. In this work, the single-stranded 5-mer TCCTC sequence was docked to the phosphatase domain of the C. elegans PNKP using the Modeller interface implemented in the UCSF Chimera software, taking into account the crystallographic information available. The structure of the complex was subject to a classical molecular dynamics protocol using Gromacs. Molecular dynamics is a computer simulation technique that allows us to compute dynamic and thermodynamic properties to determine the physical interaction between the PNKP phosphatase and the ssDNA. Department: Physical Sciences Faculty Mentor: Dr. Jorge Llano

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrench-language works237,207