E.coli Nissle increases transcription of flagella assembly and formate hydrogenlyase genes in response to colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Escherichia coli Nissle (EcN), a probiotic bacterium, has been employed in treating inflammatory bowel disease, but the nature of its therapeutic effect is not fully understood. Intestinal inflammation alters the environment, exposing the microbial population to new stresses and eliciting transcriptional responses. We administered EcN to germ-free mice and then compared its transcriptional response between DSS-treated and untreated conditions using RNA-seq analysis to identify 187 differentially expressed genes (119 upregulated, 68 downregulated) and verifying a subset with qRT-PCR. The upregulated genes included many involved in flagella biosynthesis and motility, as well as several members of the formate hydrogenlyase complex. Despite prior evidence that these pathways are both transcriptionally regulated by nitric oxide, in vitro tests did not establish that nitric oxide exposure alone elicited the transcriptional response. The results provide new information on the transcriptional response of EcN to inflammation and establish a basis for further investigation of its anti-inflammatory activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".