Structural basis for diamide modulation of ryanodine receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diamide insecticides target insect ryanodine receptors (RYRs) and cause dysregulation of calcium signaling in insect muscles and neurons, generating worldwide sales over 2 billion US dollars annually. Several resistance mutations have been reported to reduce the efficacy of the diamides, but the exact binding sites and mechanism of resistance mutations were not clear. Recently, we solved the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of RYR in complex with the anthranilic diamide chlorantraniliprole (CHL). CHL binds to the pseudo–voltage-sensor domain (pVSD) of RYR, a site in proximity to the previously identified resistance mutations. Mutagenesis studies in silico, in mutant cell lines, and in transgenic Drosophila strains revealed the key residues involved in diamide coordination and the molecular mechanism under species-selectivity and resistance mutations. We also proposed that CHL may alleviate the loss-of-function effects of some central core disease (CCD) mutations by increasing the opening probability (Po) of RYR1. In addition, we solved the crystal structures of several RYR domains from the diamondback moth and the bee, revealing insect-specific structural features which could be potentially targeted by novel insecticides. Interestingly, we found that the phosphorylation of insect RYR is temperature dependent, facilitated by the low thermal stability and dynamic structure of the insect RYR. Our structures provide a foundation for developing novel pesticides to overcome the resistance crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".