MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

353 Identification of potential response predictors to maveropepimut-S (DPX-Survivac), a novel T cell activating immunotherapy, in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer

2021· article· en· W3214232282 on OpenAlexaffabout
Oliver Dorigo, Walead Ebrahimizadeh, Barry Kennedy, Lisa D. MacDonald, Stephan Fiset, Jeannine Villella, O D L U Z H N E V S K A Y A, Tanja Pejović, Prafull Ghatage, Diane Provencher, Yogesh Bramhecha

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmunotherapyCD8Immune systemT cellAntigenOvarian cancerOncologyImmunohistochemistryCancer researchCancerCyclophosphamideInternal medicineChemotherapyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Epithelial ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the most lethal of gynecological malignancies. The high mortality is related to a late diagnosis with over 75% being at an advanced stage, high recurrence rates, and ultimately resistance to chemotherapy. Previous studies have consistently demonstrated a strong association between higher tumor T cell infiltration and improved survival in OvCa patients supporting the potential clinical utility of T cell activating immunotherapy approaches. Maveropepimut-S (MVP-S, formerly named DPX-Survivac) is a T cell activating immunotherapy which is a formulation of the proprietary drug delivery platform DPX™ with immunogenic T-cell epitopes derived from the tumor-associated antigen survivin. MVP-S in combination with intermittent low-dose cyclophosphamide has been shown to induce robust and durable antigen-specific T cell responses and anti-tumor clinical activity in recurrent OvCa patients. The current study presents translational data aimed at identifying tumor tissue-based predictive biomarkers for response to treatment with MVP-S. <h3>Methods</h3> Baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsies were collected from patients treated with MVP-S primed with immune-modulating low dose cyclophosphamide. Multiplex-immunohistochemistry (mIHC, Akoya Biosciences) and RNAseq analyses (Personalis Inc.) were used to analyze the tumor immune environment and identify potential response predictors to MVP-S. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-two patients with advanced, recurrent OvCa were enrolled in this study. mIHC analysis demonstrated that higher baseline CD3+CD8+ T cell infiltration in tumor tissue was significantly associated with anti-tumor clinical activity of MVP-S defined as &gt;10% on-treatment tumor regression. Pathway enrichment analyses using the differentially expressed genes associated with anti-tumor clinical activity confirmed these findings. In addition, we identified B cell pathway genes to be significantly upregulated in patients with &gt;10% on-treatment tumor regression. mIHC analyses of paired biopsies available for one subject with clinical response (PR) demonstrated that MVP-S treatment induced increased T and B cell infiltration in the on-treatment biopsy compared to the baseline biopsy. These findings suggest that immunogenic tumors are more susceptible to the MVP-S treatment, in line with its mechanism of action. Pathway enrichment analyses further revealed that upregulation of genes or pathways related to immune-suppression (e.g. WNT pathway) or immune evasion/exclusion (CD276, Arg2) were significantly associated with lack of anti-tumor activity indicative of potential mechanism of primary resistance. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Collectively, these results provide insight for possible response predictors to MVP-S based therapy <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT02785250 <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> The protocol and patient-informed consent form received approval by Institutional Review Boards. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. REBs: Comite d’ethique de la recherche du CHUM (Montreal, Canada); Western Institutional Review Board 20161075 (Augusta, GA, USA); FWA #00002505 (NEW YORK, NY, USA); FWA00000161, IRB00000471 (Portland, Oregon, USA); University Health Network REB (Toronto, Canada); FWA00000935, FWA00000934 (Standford, CA, USA); Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta, (Edmonton, Canada)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207