MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 10357: ARO-APOC3, an Investigational RNAi Therapeutic, Shows Similar Efficacy and Safety in Genetically Confirmed FCS and Non-FCS Participants with Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

2021· article· en· W3214630876 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Clifton, David Sullivan, John E. Baker, Christian Schwabe, Susan Thackwray, Russell Scott, James Hamilton, Armando J Lira Pineda, Bruce D. Given, Stacey Melquist, I‐Ming Chen, Javier San Martín, Gerald F. Watts, Ira J. Goldberg, Josh Knowles, Daniel Gaudet, Robert A. Hegele, Christie M. Ballantyne

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypertriglyceridemiaInternal medicineEndocrinologyApolipoprotein BGastroenterologyTriglycerideCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is an ultrarare condition caused by biallelic pathogenic DNA variants in lipolysis-associated genes, resulting in severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) and associated with high risk of acute pancreatitis with few therapeutic options. In a 16-week Phase 1 study (NCT03783377), subcutaneously administered ARO-APOC3 reduced serum apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3) and TG in healthy volunteers and participants (pts) with HTG and was well tolerated. Purpose: To report on the safety/pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of ARO-APOC3 in both FCS pts with biallelic pathogenic variants and pts with severely elevated TG at screening (>880 mg/dL) but without biallelic pathogenic variants (chylomicronemia (MCM)). Methods: Four genetically confirmed FCS pts received 50 mg ARO-APOC3 and 26 MCM pts received 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg ARO-APOC3 on Days 1 and 29. Since similar PD responses were observed among MCM pts, results were pooled across dose levels. Safety and PD responses were examined. Maximal mean/median changes from baseline for APOC3, TG, non-HDL-C, and HDL-C were reported. Results: Baseline/demographics were comparable between groups, except for mean BMI (22.1 [FCS] and 30.5 [MCM] kg/m 2 ), and mean baseline HDL-C , which were lower in FCS pts (Table 1) (p<0.0001 for both). Mean APOC3 was reduced by 98% and 96% in FCS and MCM pts, respectively. Both groups also showed similar maximum median reductions in TG of 91% and 90%, respectively. Similar to the full study, non-HDL-C was reduced and HDL-C increased with treatment in both groups (Table 1). AEs were similar between groups, suggesting a comparable safety profile. Conclusions: In patients with severe HTG, ARO-APOC3 was safe, and consistently decreased APOC3, TG, and non-HDL-C, and increased HDL-C, regardless of underlying genetic cause of HTG, and may represent a promising RNAi therapeutic for the treatment of severe HTG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207