Using Live Imaging and FUCCI Embryonic Stem Cells to Rank DevTox Risks: Adverse Growth Effects of PFOA Compared With DEP Are 26 Times Faster, 1,000 Times More Sensitive, and 13 Times Greater in Magnitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which fluoresce green during the S-G2-M phases, generate an S-shaped curve for the accumulation of cells during normal stemness (NS) culture with leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF). Since it was hypothesized that a culture of ESCs was heterogeneous in the cell cycle, it was expected that increased S-G2-M-phases of the cell cycle would make an S-shaped curve parallel to the accumulation curve. Unexpectedly, it was observed that the fraction of FUCCI ESCs in green decreases over time to a nadir at ∼24 h after previous feeding and then rapidly enters S-G2-M-phases after medium change. G1 delay by infrequent medium change is a mild stress, as it does not affect growth significantly when frequency is increased to 12 h. Perfluoro-octanoic acid (PFOA) and diethyl phthalate (DEP) were used as examples of members of the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and phthalate families of chemicals, respectively. Two adverse outcomes were used to compare dose- and time-dependent effects of PFOA and DEP. The first was cell accumulation assay by time-lapse confluence measurements, largely at Tfinal/T74 h. The second was by quantifying dominant toxicant stress shown by the suppression of mild stress that creates a green fed/unfed peak. In terms of speed, PFOA is 26 times faster than DEP for producing a time-dependent LOAEL dose at 100 uM (that is, 2 h for PFOA and 52 h for DEP). PFOA has 1000-fold more sensitive LOAEL doses than DEP for suppressing ESC accumulation (confluence) at day 3 and day 2. There were two means to compare the magnitude of the growth suppression of PFOA and DEP. For the suppression of the accumulation of cells measured by confluence at Tfinal/T74h, there was a 13-fold suppression at the highest dose of PFOA > the highest dose of DEP. For the suppression of entry into the cell cycle after the G1 phase by stress on day 1 and 2, there is 10-fold more suppression by PFOA than DEP. The data presented here suggest that FUCCI ESCs can assay the suppression of accumulated growth or predict the suppression of future growth by the suppression of fed/unfed green fluorescence peaks and that PFOA's adverse effects are faster and larger and can occur at more sensitive lower doses than DEP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".