MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3216334861 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab196.032

EPCO-33. CELL-TYPE PROPORTION DECONVOLUTION OF PEDIATRIC CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMORS FROM SINGLE NUCLEI RNA-seq UNCOVERS UNDERLYING TRANSCRIPTOMIC CHANGES FROM BULK TUMOR RNA-seq COMPARED TO NORMAL BRAIN

2021· article· en· W3216334861 on OpenAlexaff
Min Kyung Lee, Nasim Azizgolshani, Fred Kolling, Lananh Nguyen, George Zanazzi, Brock C. Christensen

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTranscriptomeGeneRNACell typeRNA-SeqGene expressionBrain tumorCellMolecular biologyCancer researchGeneticsPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Identifying transcriptomic alterations in pediatric central nervous system (pCNS) tumors often relies on transcriptomic profiles from bulk tissue RNA-sequencing that can be confounded by varying cell type proportions across tumor and normal brain tissues. We utilized single nuclei RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) and bulk RNA-seq in 33 pCNS tumors and 3 non-diseased pediatric brain tissue samples collected from the Norris Cotton Cancer Center to identify variation in gene expression in bulk tissue attributed to overrepresentation of specific cell-type populations when determining differentially expressed genes comparing pCNS tumors to normal pediatric brain tissues. snRNA-seq of 43,515 nuclei (mean = 1,209 nuclei/sample) revealed large proportions of astrocytes (median = 0.45, range = 0.24–0.93) and oligodendrocytes (median = 0.37, range = 0.00–0.66) in pCNS tumors. Compared to normal pediatric brain, proportions of astrocytes were significantly higher (P = 9.2E-03) and neurons were significantly lower (P = 9.4E-03) in pCNS tumors. Differential expression analyses comparing bulk RNA-sequencing data from pCNS tumors to normal pediatric brain identified 902 additional differentially expressed genes (# DE genes = 1,802) when adjusting for astrocyte and neuron proportions compared with unadjusted analysis (# DE genes = 900). In cell-type proportion unadjusted analysis, top DE genes included astrocyte-specific markers, GFAP and CIITA, both of which were found to be not significantly differentially expressed in cell-type proportion adjusted analysis. Indeed, pathways enrichment analysis revealed DE genes in unadjusted models were associated with processes of the neurons and astrocytes such as interferon signaling and postsynaptic signal transmission. After adjustment for astrocyte and neuron proportions, DE genes were associated with defensins and DNA replication-related processes. Our results highlight new potential biological pathways essential in pCNS tumors and indicate the significance of the distribution of varying cell types in tissue samples when conducting studies to investigate transcriptomic alterations in bulk tissue of pCNS tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→