CTIM-25. A RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB OR PLACEBO COMBINED WITH RADIOTHERAPY PLUS TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA WITH METHYLATED MGMT PROMOTER: CHECKMATE 548
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Novel therapies are needed in newly diagnosed glioblastoma as nearly all patients experience recurrence following standard-of-care radiotherapy (RT) + temozolomide (TMZ), including patients with tumors with methylated MGMT promoter, a positive prognostic factor and predictor of benefit with TMZ. Here, we report the final analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety from an international randomized, single-blind phase-3 study of nivolumab (NIVO)+RT+TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated/indeterminate MGMT promoter (CheckMate 548; NCT02667587). METHODS Patients (N=716) aged ≥ 18y were randomized 1:1 regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression to NIVO (240 mg Q2W×8, then 480 mg Q4W) + RT (60 Gy over 6 weeks) + TMZ (75 mg/m2 QD during RT, then 4-week break, then 150–200 mg/m2 QD on days 1–5 of every 28-day cycle for 6 cycles) or placebo (PBO)+RT+TMZ. The dual-primary endpoints were PFS by blinded independent central review and OS, both overall and without baseline corticosteroids. RESULTS As of December 22, 2020, median PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.9–11.8) with NIVO+RT+TMZ and 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.7–12.5) with PBO+RT+TMZ (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.90–1.25]). Median OS was 28.9 months (95% CI, 24.4–31.6) with NIVO+RT+TMZ and 32.1 months (95% CI, 29.4–33.8) with PBO+RT+TMZ (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.91–1.33]). Among patients without baseline corticosteroids, median OS was 31.3 months (95% CI, 28.6–34.8) with NIVO+RT+TMZ and 33.0 months (95% CI, 31.0–35.1) with PBO+RT+TMZ (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.87–1.43]). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were 52.4% and 33.6% with NIVO+RT+TMZ and PBO+RT+TMZ, respectively. CONCLUSIONS NIVO added to RT+TMZ did not improve survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated/indeterminate MGMT promoter. No new safety signals were observed with NIVO. The role of immunotherapy in this treatment landscape remains an area for further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".