CTNI-26. PHASE 2 STUDY OF DIANHYDROGALACTITOL (VAL-083) IN PATIENTS WITH MGMT-UNMETHYLATED, BEVACIZUMAB-NAÏVE GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE RECURRENT AND ADJUVANT SETTING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Current standard-of-care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery followed by concurrent therapy with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ. Almost all GBM patients experience recurrent/progressive disease despite upfront standard-of-care treatment, with a median survival of 3-9 months after recurrence. Unmethylated promoter for O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) is a validated biomarker for TMZ-resistance and is correlated with poor patient prognosis. VAL-083 is a bi-functional DNA-targeting agent which rapidly induces interstrand DNA cross-links at N7-guanine inducing double-strand breaks causing cell death and acts independently of MGMT DNA repair. This trial is an open-label two-arm biomarker-driven phase 2 clinical trial in MGMT-unmethylated, bevacizumab-naïve GBM patients with either recurrent (Group 1) or newly diagnosed GBM requiring adjuvant therapy after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide (Group 2). Patients receive VAL-083 IV at 30 or 40 mg/m2/d on days 1, 2, and 3 of a 21-day cycle. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of VAL-083 on median overall survival (mOS) in MGMT-unmethylated recurrent GBM patients (Group 1); and progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed GBM patients requiring adjuvant therapy after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide (Group 2), compared to historical controls in both groups. Tumor response is assessed by MRI every 42 days, using RANO criteria. The initial starting dose in this study was 40 mg/m2/d on days 1, 2, and 3 of a 21-day cycle, which was subsequently reduced to 30 mg/m2/d to improve tolerance due to myelosuppression. As of May 2021, Group 1 (Recurrent GBM) is fully enrolled: 35 evaluable patients have received 40 mg/m2/d and 48 evaluable patients have received 30 mg/m2/d VAL-083. In the adjuvant setting (Group 2), 35 evaluable patients have been enrolled (30 mg/m2/day). Enrollment, safety data and efficacy updates will be presented at the meeting. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02717962.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".