Comparative Enhancer Map of Cattle Muscle Genome Annotated by ATAC-Seq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annotating regulatory elements could benefit the interpretation of the molecular mechanism of genome-wide association study (GWAS) hits. In this work, we performed transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) to annotate the cattle muscle genome's functional elements. A total of 10,023 and 11,360 peaks were revealed in muscle genomes of adult and embryo cattle, respectively. The two peak sets produced 8,850 differentially accessible regions (DARs), including 2,515 promoters and 4,319 putative enhancers. These functional elements were associated with the cell cycle, muscle development, and lipid metabolism. A total of 15 putative enhancers were selected for a dual-luciferase reporter assay, and 12 of them showed enhancer activity in cattle myoblasts. Interestingly, the GeneHancer database has annotated the interactions of eight active enhancers with gene promoters, such as embryo-specific peak1053 (log2FC = 1.81, embryo/adult, E/A) with ligand-dependent nuclear receptor corepressor-like protein ( LCORL ) and embryo-specific peak4218 (log2FC = 1.81) with FERM domain-containing 8 ( FRMD8 ). A total of 295 GWAS loci from the animal QTL database were mapped to 183 putative enhancers, including rs109554838 (associated with cattle body weight and average daily gain) to peak1053 and rs110294629 (associated with beef shear force and tenderness score) to peak4218. Notably, peak4218 has been found to be involved in mouse embryo development. Deleting peak4218 clearly reduced luciferase activity ( P = 3.30E-04). Our comparative enhancer map is expected to benefit the area of beef cattle breeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".