Chimeric mutants of staphylococcal hemolysin, which act as both one‐component and two‐component hemolysin, created by grafting the stem domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus expresses several hemolytic pore-forming toxins (PFTs), which are all commonly composed of three domains: cap, rim and stem. PFTs are expressed as soluble monomers and assemble to form a transmembrane β-barrel pore in the erythrocyte cell membrane. The stem domain undergoes dramatic conformational changes to form a pore. Staphylococcal PFTs are classified into two groups: one-component α-hemolysin (α-HL) and two-component γ-hemolysin (γ-HL). The α-HL forms a homo-heptamer, whereas γ-HL is an octamer composed of F-component (LukF) and S-component (Hlg2). Because PFTs are used as materials for nanopore-based sensors, knowledge of the functional properties of PFTs is used to develop new, engineered PFTs. However, it remains challenging to design PFTs with a β-barrel pore because their formation as transmembrane protein assemblies requires large conformational changes. In the present study, aiming to investigate the design principles of the β-barrel formed as a consequence of the conformational change, chimeric mutants composed of the cap/rim domains of α-HL and the stem of LukF or Hlg2 were prepared. Biochemical characterization and electron microscopy showed that one of them assembles as a heptameric one-component PFT, whereas another participates as both a heptameric one- and heptameric/octameric two-component PFT. All chimeric mutants intrinsically assemble into SDS-resistant oligomers. Based on these observations, the role of the stem domain of these PFTs is discussed. These findings provide clues for the engineering of staphylococcal PFT β-barrels for use in further promising applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".