MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase 1b expansion study of CX-5461 in patients with solid tumors and <i>BRCA2 </i>and/or <i>PALB2</i> mutation.

2022· article· en· W4205690438 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer J. Knox, Amit M. Oza, Diane Provencher, John Soong, Daniel McCormick, Jimmy Chen, Jenny Chen, Ariel Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePALB2Synthetic lethalityDNA repairPARP inhibitorOlaparibCancer researchPopulationOncologyBRCA mutationCarcinogenesisCancerGenome instabilityGermline mutationBRCA2 ProteinProstate cancerInternal medicineMutationOvarian cancerDNA damageGeneticsPoly ADP ribose polymeraseBiologyPolymeraseGeneDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS622 Background: BRCA and PALB2 proteins play important roles in the maintenance of genomic stability as they are essential for error-free repair of double-stranded DNA breaks, while deficiency of these proteins promotes error-prone DNA repair, chromosomal instability and carcinogenesis. Inherited mutations in BRCA genes predispose to various early onset cancers. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) inducing synthetic lethality in tumors with homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair deficiencies have been approved for treatment in patients with germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Unfortunately, resistance to PARPi associated with multiple mechanisms can be observed over time, suggesting a prominent unmet need for the development of new treatment options. CX-5461, a G-quadruplex stabilizer, employs an alternative mechanism in destabilizing the DNA replication fork to promote DNA damage resulting in cancer cell lethality in HR-deficient (HRD) tumors, thus represent a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with defects in HR-repair. Methods: A prior phase I dose escalation study has been completed for CX-5461 (CCTG IND.231, NCT02719977) but additional safety data are required to define the chronic tolerable dose for phase 2 trials. Therefore, a phase Ib expansion trial was designed for two doses preselected from our previous phase I trial to determine the final recommended phase II dose (RP2D) by evaluating safety, tolerability and objective response rate in a more selected population. This trial will enroll patients in two cohorts; the main cohort recruiting patients with pancreatic, breast, ovarian or prostate cancer with germline BRCA2 and/or PALB2 mutation, and an exploratory cohort recruiting ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 and/or other HRD-associated mutations. Major eligibility criteria include documented evidence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline mutation in BRCA2 and/or PALB2 for main cohort patients, documented evidence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline mutation or a clinically actionable somatic mutation in BRCA1 and/or other HRD-associated mutation for exploratory cohort. Patients with non-adenocarcinoma histology of pancreatic cancer, known photosensitivity disorders of the skin, or patients with ophthalmological conditions will not be enrolled. An initial 16 eligible patients for the main cohort and 10 eligible patients for the exploratory cohort will be enrolled in parallel to receive CX-5461 at 250mg/m2, delivered via IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 8 of a 28-day cycle. Upon completion of the initial arms with no safety concerns, another two arms will open to enroll an additional 16 patients for the main cohort and 10 patients for the exploratory cohort to receive CX-5461 at 325mg/m2 of the same dosing schedule. Clinical trial information: NCT04890613.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→