MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206411951 · doi:10.31083/j.jin2004088

Neurofilament light as a biomarker of axonal degeneration in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

2021· article· en· W4206411951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrative Neuroscience · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationBioClinicaF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationPfizerEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsNeurofilamentCerebrospinal fluidPathologyAlzheimer's diseaseMedicinePsychologyNeuroscienceDiseaseInternal medicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light and plasma neurofilament light concentrations are elevated in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. We investigated the clinical relevance of increased neurofilament light concentrations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease patients. In this study, 244 subjects were divided into cognitively normal control (n = 67), stable mild cognitive impairment (n = 52), progressive mild cognitive impairment (n = 68), and Alzheimer's disease (n = 57). Linear regression examined the relationships between neurofilament light levels in cerebrospinal fluid or plasma and the diagnostic group. The relationships between neurofilament light and other biomarkers were assessed by Spearman correlation. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test cerebrospinal fluid and plasma neurofilament light as predictors of Alzheimer's disease characteristics, including cognition, cortical glucose metabolism, and brain structure. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma neurofilament light levels were significantly elevated in Alzheimer's disease. Still, the correlations between neurofilament light and other cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers within the diagnostic groups were often not statistically significant. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma neurofilament light for progressive mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease was almost the same as that of cerebrospinal fluid total tau (T-tau). It is phosphorylated tau (P-tau) and high cerebrospinal fluid. Neurofilament light predicted conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. A high neurofilament light is related to poor cognition, low cerebral metabolism, hippocampal atrophy, and ventricular enlargement caused by Alzheimer's disease. Our work further identifies cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light and plasma neurofilament light as biomarkers of axonal degeneration in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it