From Drosophila to Human: Biological Function of E3 Ligase Godzilla and Its Role in Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ubiquitin–proteasome system is of fundamental importance in all fields of biology due to its impact on proteostasis and in regulating cellular processes. Ubiquitination, a type of protein post-translational modification, involves complex enzymatic machinery, such as E3 ubiquitin ligases. The E3 ligases regulate the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to a target protein and are involved in various cellular mechanisms, including the cell cycle, cell division, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and neurotransmission. Because the E3 ligases regulate so many physiological events, they are also associated with pathologic conditions, such as cancer, neurological disorders, and immune-related diseases. This review focuses specifically on the protease-associated transmembrane-containing the Really Interesting New Gene (RING) subset of E3 ligases. We describe the structure, partners, and physiological functions of the Drosophila Godzilla E3 ligase and its human homologues, RNF13, RNF167, and ZNRF4. Also, we summarize the information that has emerged during the last decade regarding the association of these E3 ligases with pathophysiological conditions, such as cancer, asthma, and rare genetic disorders. We conclude by highlighting the limitations of the current knowledge and pinpointing the unresolved questions relevant to RNF13, RNF167, and ZNRF4 ubiquitin ligases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".