MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210359121 · doi:10.1139/gen-2020-0201

Genome-wide identification of C2H2-type zinc finger gene family members and their expression during abiotic stress responses in orchardgrass (<i>Dactylis glomerata</i>)

2022· article· en· W4210359121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuai Yang, Guangyan Feng, Zhongfu Yang, Qiuxu Liu, Jiating Han, Xiaoheng Xu, Gang Nie, Linkai Huang, Xinquan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyDactylis glomerataAbiotic stressGeneticsGeneGene familyGenomeAbiotic componentPhylogenetic treeBotanyPoaceaeEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The C2H2-type zinc finger protein (ZFP) family is one of the largest transcription factor families in the plant kingdom and its members are involved in plant growth, development, and stress responses. As an economically valuable perennial graminaceous forage crop, orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) is an important feedstuff resource owing to its high yield and quality. In this study, 125 C2H2-type ZFPs in orchardgrass (Dg-ZFPs) were identified and further classified by phylogenetic analysis. The members with similar gene structures were generally clustered into the same groups, with proteins containing the conserved QALGGH motif being concentrated in groups VIII and IX. Gene ontology and miRNA target analyses indicated that Dg-ZFPs likely perform diverse biological functions through their gene interactions. The RNA-seq data revealed differentially expressed genes across tissues and development phases, suggesting that some Dg-ZFPs might participate in growth and development regulation. Abiotic stress responses of Dg-ZFP genes were verified by qPCR and Saccharomyces cerevisiae transformation, revealing that Dg-ZFP125 could enhance the tolerance of yeasts to osmotic and salt stresses. Our study performed a novel systematic analysis of Dg-ZFPs in orchardgrass, providing a reference for this gene family in other grasses and revealing new insights for enhancing gene utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome→Same topicPlant Molecular Biology Research→French-language works237,207→