MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P112: ENERGIZE AND ENERGIZE-T: TWO PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDIES OF MITAPIVAT IN ADULTS WITH NON--TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT OR TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT ALPHA- OR BETA-THALASSEMIA

2022· article· en· W4210423203 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin H.M. Kuo, D. Mark Layton, Hanny Al‐Samkari, Antonios Kattamis, Seema Sheth, Alì Taher, Vip Viprakasit, Christina X. Chamberlain, Lauren Czapla, Sarah Gheuens, Megan T. Lynch, Bo Tong, K Uhlig, Maria Domenica Cappellini

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalassemiaMedicineInternal medicinePlaceboIneffective erythropoiesisBlood transfusionGastroenterologyAnemiaErythropoiesisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Thalassemias are characterized by imbalanced globin-chain production resulting in excess α- or β-globin precipitation, hemolytic anemia, and ineffective erythropoiesis.1,2 ATP levels are reduced in thalassemic red blood cells (RBCs), despite increased energy demands.3,4 Mitapivat is an oral activator of RBC pyruvate kinase (PKR), a glycolytic enzyme that regulates ATP production.5 In a phase 2 study of patients with α- or β-non–transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT), twice-daily (BID) dosing with mitapivat increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels by ≥1.0 g/dL in 80% of patients,6 supporting the broadening of mitapivat’s development in thalassemia. Aims: To report the study designs of ENERGIZE (2021-000211-23) and ENERGIZE-T (2021-000212-34), two phase 3 trials to assess the efficacy and safety of mitapivat in adults with α- or β-NTDT or transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT), respectively. Methods: Both studies are phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (Figure). In ENERGIZE, approximately 171 eligible adults with NTDT will be randomized (2:1) to receive 100 mg mitapivat BID or placebo for 24 weeks. Upon completion, eligible patients can transition to a 5-year, open-label extension. Key inclusion criteria: documented diagnosis of thalassemia (β-thalassemia ± α-globin mutations, Hb E β-thalassemia, or α-thalassemia [Hb H disease]), Hb concentration ≤10.0 g/dL, and NTDT defined as ≤5 RBC units during the 24-week period before randomization and no RBC transfusion ≤8 weeks prior. The primary endpoint is an Hb response defined as a ≥1.0 g/dL increase in average Hb concentration from Week 12 through 24 compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcomes, changes in Hb, markers of hemolysis and erythropoiesis, and safety. In ENERGIZE-T, approximately 240 eligible adults with TDT will be randomized (2:1) to receive 100 mg mitapivat BID or placebo for 48 weeks. Upon completion, eligible patients can transition to a 5-year, open-label extension. Key inclusion criteria: documented diagnosis of thalassemia (same genotypes as detailed for the ENERGIZE study), and TDT defined as 6–20 RBC units transfused and no transfusion-free period ≥6 weeks during the 24 weeks before randomization. The primary endpoint is a transfusion reduction response, defined as a ≥50% reduction in transfused RBC units with a reduction of ≥2 units of transfused RBCs in any consecutive 12-week period through Week 48 compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints include additional measures of transfusion burden, changes in iron markers, and safety. Results: Not yet available. Conclusions: ENERGIZE and ENERGIZE-T are the first pivotal studies to assess a potential treatment across a broad spectrum of patients with thalassemia (ie, patients with TDT and NTDT; α- and β-thalassemias). ENERGIZE and ENERGIZE-T will evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitapivat, a novel, first-in-class oral activator of PKR. Both studies are actively recruiting.References 1. Taher et al. Lancet 2018; 391:155–67. 2. Cappellini et al. Blood Rev 2018; 32:300–11. 3. Khandros et al. Blood 2012; 119:5265–75. 4. Shaeffer. J Biol Chem 1988; 263:13663–95. 5. Kung et al. Blood 2017; 130:1347–566. 6. Kuo et al. HemaSphere 2021. Abstract S267.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207