P112: ENERGIZE AND ENERGIZE-T: TWO PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDIES OF MITAPIVAT IN ADULTS WITH NON--TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT OR TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT ALPHA- OR BETA-THALASSEMIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Thalassemias are characterized by imbalanced globin-chain production resulting in excess α- or β-globin precipitation, hemolytic anemia, and ineffective erythropoiesis.1,2 ATP levels are reduced in thalassemic red blood cells (RBCs), despite increased energy demands.3,4 Mitapivat is an oral activator of RBC pyruvate kinase (PKR), a glycolytic enzyme that regulates ATP production.5 In a phase 2 study of patients with α- or β-non–transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT), twice-daily (BID) dosing with mitapivat increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels by ≥1.0 g/dL in 80% of patients,6 supporting the broadening of mitapivat’s development in thalassemia. Aims: To report the study designs of ENERGIZE (2021-000211-23) and ENERGIZE-T (2021-000212-34), two phase 3 trials to assess the efficacy and safety of mitapivat in adults with α- or β-NTDT or transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT), respectively. Methods: Both studies are phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (Figure). In ENERGIZE, approximately 171 eligible adults with NTDT will be randomized (2:1) to receive 100 mg mitapivat BID or placebo for 24 weeks. Upon completion, eligible patients can transition to a 5-year, open-label extension. Key inclusion criteria: documented diagnosis of thalassemia (β-thalassemia ± α-globin mutations, Hb E β-thalassemia, or α-thalassemia [Hb H disease]), Hb concentration ≤10.0 g/dL, and NTDT defined as ≤5 RBC units during the 24-week period before randomization and no RBC transfusion ≤8 weeks prior. The primary endpoint is an Hb response defined as a ≥1.0 g/dL increase in average Hb concentration from Week 12 through 24 compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcomes, changes in Hb, markers of hemolysis and erythropoiesis, and safety. In ENERGIZE-T, approximately 240 eligible adults with TDT will be randomized (2:1) to receive 100 mg mitapivat BID or placebo for 48 weeks. Upon completion, eligible patients can transition to a 5-year, open-label extension. Key inclusion criteria: documented diagnosis of thalassemia (same genotypes as detailed for the ENERGIZE study), and TDT defined as 6–20 RBC units transfused and no transfusion-free period ≥6 weeks during the 24 weeks before randomization. The primary endpoint is a transfusion reduction response, defined as a ≥50% reduction in transfused RBC units with a reduction of ≥2 units of transfused RBCs in any consecutive 12-week period through Week 48 compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints include additional measures of transfusion burden, changes in iron markers, and safety. Results: Not yet available. Conclusions: ENERGIZE and ENERGIZE-T are the first pivotal studies to assess a potential treatment across a broad spectrum of patients with thalassemia (ie, patients with TDT and NTDT; α- and β-thalassemias). ENERGIZE and ENERGIZE-T will evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitapivat, a novel, first-in-class oral activator of PKR. Both studies are actively recruiting.References 1. Taher et al. Lancet 2018; 391:155–67. 2. Cappellini et al. Blood Rev 2018; 32:300–11. 3. Khandros et al. Blood 2012; 119:5265–75. 4. Shaeffer. J Biol Chem 1988; 263:13663–95. 5. Kung et al. Blood 2017; 130:1347–566. 6. Kuo et al. HemaSphere 2021. Abstract S267.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".