GenomeTornadoPlot: a novel R package for CNV visualization and focality analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Analysis of focal copy number variations (CNVs) is highly relevant for cancer research, as they pinpoint driver genes. More specifically, due to selective pressure oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are more often affected by these events than neighboring passengers. In cases where multiple candidates co-reside in a genomic locus, careful comparison is required to either identify multigenic minimally deleted regions of synergistic co-mutations, or the true single driver gene. The study of focal CNVs in large cancer genome cohorts requires specialized visualization and statistical analysis. RESULTS: We developed the GenomeTornadoPlot R-package which generates gene-centric visualizations of CNV types, locations and lengths from cohortwise NGS data. Furthermore, the software enables the pairwise comparison of proximate genes to identify co-mutation patterns or driver-passenger hierarchies. The visual examination provided by GenomeTornadoPlot is further supported by adaptable local and global focality scoring. Integrated into the GenomeTornadoPlot R-Package is the comprehensive PCAWG database of CNVs, comprising 2976 cancer genome entities from 46 cohorts of the Pan-cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes project. The GenomeTornadoPlot R-package can be used to perform exploratory or hypothesis-driven analyses on the basis of the PCAWG data or in combination with data provided by the user. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GenomeTornadoPlot is written in R script and released via github: . The package is under the license of GPL-3.0.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.038 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".